Pages

Thursday, 22 February 2018

The Actor-Manager (1898) by LEONARD MERRICK [Re-Post]


Hodder & Stoughton Collected Edition (spine), c 1922  


 
 
 
'An author never remembers anything except his grudge against the critic who gave him a bad notice, but I shall remind him who I am.  I hear they have only engaged the principals so far, and the first call is for twelve o'clock tomorrow.  I mean to waylay him as he goes in.'

 

    To waylay a man as he goes in; to scheme for an introduction to another who doesn't want to know you; to submit to rudeness, and disguise privation under well-cut clothes; to smile in the Strand and break your heart in private, are the essential preliminaries to success on the stage, unless you have money, or your father was a favourite actor.

 




The Novel:  Royce Oliphant, a jobless London actor and unperformed playwright, meets fellow actor Alma King while the two are eating their meagre Christmas dinner in a shabby restaurant located not far from the British Museum.  Oliphant is depressed about his stalled career and his failure to live up to the high ideals which saw him abandon his plans to become a clergyman in favour of pursuing a life on the stage.  He befriends Alma who, after initially feeling wary of his kindness, permits him to accompany her back to her lodgings, the long walk and their mutual loneliness encouraging him to open up to her about his private vision of a theatre in which art will no longer be subordinate to the demands of the box office.  Unfortunately, their plan to have tea together is interrupted by the arrival of Alma's curmudgeonly landlady, who throws her out for failing to pay her rent, retaining her few items of luggage as security.
 

Outraged by this, Oliphant insists on taking the now homeless Alma back to his own lodgings where she's immediately offered a room by his landlady, the kindly Mrs Tubbs –– a woman who has a soft spot for actors because her own niece, now deceased, was a former member of what she admiringly refers to as 'the perfession.'  Oliphant and Alma go on to form a bond which is only broken when, after months of struggle, he finally lands a supporting role in a bad play and she's engaged by a travelling repertory company set to undertake a similarly unpromising tour of South Africa.  They part reluctantly but willingly, apparently blind to the fact that their mutual sympathy and growing affection for each other were on the verge of blossoming into love. 

 
Oliphant is quickly replaced in his role –– the actor-manager who hired him suspects him of intriguing with the play's author behind his back, an unforgivable sin and an inexcusable threat to his authority –– and finds himself jobless again.  Luckily, his agent soon receives an offer to have an unproduced play he wrote, titled The Impostor, staged in a London theatre.  Oliphant is offered another small part in this production and soon becomes smitten with Blanche Ellerton, its pretty blonde leading lady.  When the play's leading man becomes ill one night, Oliphant substitutes for him and makes the role his own, launching his London career and obtaining a lucrative offer to tour the provinces into the bargain.  Blanche joins the touring company and the two naturally fall in love –– or what they quickly manage to convince themselves is love –– and make plans to marry.  In the meantime, Oliphant's star continues to rise, resulting in an offer to join the repertory company of Greatorex, one of London's most respected and 'artistic' actor-managers. 

 
Oliphant and Blanche marry and move to a new flat, where they entertain lavishly and become known to their rich and fashionable friends as 'the romantic couple,' appearing together in many a successful Greatorex production.  By the time their son is born, however, Oliphant has realized that he and Blanche are temperamentally unsuited to each other and has come to regret their hasty, emotionally unsatisfying marriage.  Blanche, who has no time for her husband's high ideals, begins to play up to his rich but silly friend Otho Fairbairn, convincing him to back her 'darling Royce' in a theatre of his own in which she, of course, will play every leading female part.

 
At a rehearsal for a new play, Oliphant is unexpectedly reunited with Alma –– now returned from South Africa and performing in a role which, while minor, allows her unrecognized talent to shine at its brightest.  They resume their interrupted friendship, with Oliphant continuing to deny his feelings for her because to do so would be, in his eyes, a caddish betrayal of his principles.  When he receives news that his beloved son is sick, it is Alma, not the self-centred Blanche, who supports him during the boy's illness and subsequent death.  Blanche's callous, self-dramatizing response to this event –– she pretends to be overcome by grief but still finds time to send news of the tragedy to a magazine in hopes of gaining some free publicity –– proves to Oliphant that he no longer loves her if, indeed, he ever really did.

 
But this is Victorian England where divorce, justified or not, is never easily arranged.  Blanche and Oliphant stay together and Blanche uses Fairbairn's growing passion for her to secure them a lease on a refurbished London theatre.  Oliphant clashes with his wife over his refusal to bow to popular taste, choosing plays for his first two productions which, while artistically sound, prove to be commercially disastrous.  Only his third production –– a fashionable French comedy he despises –– makes money, proving Blanche's point that audiences will always choose what is entertaining and amusing over what is allegedly edifying and ennobling.  

 
Oliphant's dreams of creating high art have now been shattered.  He gives up the lease on his theatre, along with the ever-supportive Alma (whom he has hired with Blanche's knowledge and consent) and what remains of his reputation, and resigns himself to being no more than a mercenary 'talent for hire' for the rest of his career.  Blanche tries to persuade him to abandon his idealism and stage another popular play, arguing that they have a position in society to uphold that must not be sacrificed for anything as meaningless as artistic integrity.  Putting her own needs first as always, Blanche uses her gifts as an actress to persuade the sexually-obsessed Fairbairn to take her to Europe, where she can divorce Oliphant and marry him without news of their elopement becoming the kind of scandal that may permanently injure if not ruin her career.

 
Although its plot may sound preposterously melodramatic, The Actor-Manager is actually a shrewd and damning investigation of the conflict between art and commerce or, to put it another way, between impracticality and pragmatism.  Like the title character in Merrick's 1911 novel The Position of Peggy Harper, Blanche Ellerton embodies the word 'pragmatism' and all the sacrifices –– love, family, duty, plus any sense of shame inspired by notions of fidelity or conventional morality –– which must, in her view, be made to obtain success and everything that supposedly accompanies it.  Oliphant, on the other hand, is the epitome of the high-minded, noble-hearted failure –– a proud, often blindly stubborn man who possesses all the qualities society pretends to admire while secretly despising anybody foolish enough to actually attempt to live by them.  

 
This conflict is echoed, even parodied, in the figures of Blanche's parents –– a mother who writes cheap newspaper novelettes which support the family while the father, an 'artistic' novelist whose work consistently fails to sell, adopts a superior attitude to her more remunerative efforts, making him as cruel as he is bombastic and, for the most part, ridiculous.  Like Oliphant's landlady Mrs Tubbs, these characters threaten to dominate the story at times because they're so realistic and believable –– qualities which may explain why Merrick, like his protagonist, was always more popular with his fellow writers than he was with a public which demanded fairytale endings where sin was always punished and virtue always received its predictable if consistently implausible reward.  The appeal of The Actor-Manager –– which could easily be adapted for a modern audience by making Oliphant a RADA graduate and Blanche a soap opera star –– was best captured by William Dean Howells in the introduction he wrote for a new edition of it published in 1918:  'I can recall no English novel in which the study of temperament and character is carried farther or deeper, allowing for what the people are, and I do not remember a false or mistaken line or colour in it.  For anything to equal it, we must go to the Slavs, in such triumphs of their naturalness as Turgenev's Smoke, or the society passages of Tolstoy's War and Peace.'  

 
You read Leonard Merrick not so much for his plots, but for his remarkable ability to delineate a world of shabby gentility where hope, slender though it is, is obliged to co-exist alongside the unpleasant and usually inescapable realities of loneliness, disillusion, compromise and failure.
 
 
 


LEONARD MERRICK, c 1920
 
 
 
 
The Writer:  Leonard Merrick was born Leonard Miller in Belsize Park, London on 21 February 1864 to wealthy Jewish parents.  He was raised in luxury and educated at Brighton College, after which he expected to go to Germany to study law at Heidelberg University.  However, the sudden collapse of his father's business meant this plan had to be abandoned, forcing him to make his own way in life as best he could from that point onward.  

 
At the age of eighteen he travelled to South Africa with his now bankrupt parents, where he worked as a supervisor in the diamond fields and for a time as a clerk in a local courthouse before almost dying of typhus –– a brush with death that almost certainly hastened his return to England.  Stage-struck from an early age, he talked his way into a position in a provincial repertory company (living and acting in the same down-at-heel environment in which so many, but not all, of his novels are set) before abandoning the stage in 1884 to try his luck as a novelist.  It was around this time that he changed his surname by deed poll from 'Miller' to 'Merrick' –– the name he had always been known by as an actor.

 
His first novel, Mr Bazalgette's Legacy, was published in 1888 and was not successful.  Its low sales forced Merrick to return to the stage and, after borrowing money from a friend, he sailed for New York, where roles for genteel Englishmen proved as difficult to come by as they had been in London.  To keep himself occupied between auditions, he wrote a second novel called Violet Moses for which he was offered $150 by one North American publisher and nothing at all by several others.  Rejecting the $150 even though he was sick and could barely scrape together the money required to pay his passage home, he returned to England where Violet Moses was finally accepted and published, again to little acclaim, in 1891.  A third novel The Man Who Was Good followed in 1892 and sold well enough (but not well enough to permanently ease his straitened financial circumstances) to encourage him to continue writing.
 
 

LEONARD MERRICK, c 1930
 
 
 
In 1894 he married Hope Butler-Wilkins (author of a 1905 novel titled When A Girl's Engaged), fathering a daughter named Lesley who would go on to edit a posthumous 1950 collection of his short fiction titled The Leonard Merrick Omnibus.  Shortly after Lesley's birth the family relocated to Paris –– a city that served as the setting for so much of what he wrote about poets, boulevardiers and others striving to live la vie artistique in its cafés and brasseries.  His friend, the Irish-born/US based author and journalist Frank Harris, described Merrick during his Paris years as 'a small, handsome man, slight but wiry and healthy, with melancholy, dark, brooding eyes, long straight nose, and large black moustache.'  

 
Although he apparently possessed no gift for self-promotion –– a skill every bit as vital to literary success in Victorian and Edwardian times as it is today –– Merrick nevertheless went on to publish nine more novels, five plays and nine volumes of short stories between 1896 and 1930, many of which were reissued in a 1918 Deluxe Edition featuring specially commissioned introductions (a great honour at the time) penned by famous fellow authors of the day including HG Wells, Arthur Pinero, GK Chesterton and William Dean Howells.  Despite being described as a 'writer's writer' by JM Barrie (author of Peter Pan, as portrayed by Johnny Depp in the 2004 film Finding Neverland), Merrick's work, which cleverly combined subtly-rendered satire with unsentimental honesty, never attained the popularity it deserved during his lifetime.  His wife died in 1917 and Merrick himself virtually penniless in a London nursing home on 7 August 1939.  He was one of George Orwell's favourite novelists and one of the first to write realistically about showbusiness and its associated pitfalls.

 
His best novels are generally considered to be Cynthia (1896), The Quaint Companions (1903), Conrad in Quest of his Youth (also 1903) and The Position of Peggy Harper (1911), although any of his early work (ie. anything he published between 1896 and 1915) is worth reading if you can find it.  This may not be as difficult as it sounds because much of it is still available second-hand and is now beginning to be republished online.


 
 
Use the link below to download a free legal copy of The Actor-Manager in digital format.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The work of LEONARD MERRICK is also being sold in 'new' paperback editions published by Indian print-on-demand companies like BiblioBazaar and the Nabu Press.  Be warned, however, that these are cheap and sometimes poorly executed digital scans of the Hodder and Stoughton 'Collected Edition' which, at prices ranging from US$25-$35, are frankly not worth the money. 


 

 

A biography by WILLIAM BAKER and JEANETTE ROBERTS SHUMAKER titled Leonard Merrick: A Forgotten Novelist's Novelist was published by the Fairleigh-Dickinson University Press in 2009.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
You might also enjoy:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
Originally published 9 June 2012 
 
 
 
 
Last updated 25 September 2022 § 
 
 

Friday, 16 February 2018

The Write Advice 104: ARIELLE AARONSON


I think ideally a translator should read through the entire work and be able to see through the text to grasp the style of writing… But all authors have different writing styles, of course.  So a huge part of me would say that it’s important to stick as close to the author’s intent and voice as possible. However, I also feel that reading should be a pleasurable experience. Therefore, I will also try to adapt my translation in order to reflect how an English speaker might perceive the text.  Does this involve making subjective assumptions?  Yes.  While that may be problematic at times, I also find that when sentences are translated too faithfully they jump off the page as sounding awkward and forced.  And that irks me.

Québec Reads [date unspecified]


 

Use the link below to visit the website of Canadian writer and translator ARIELLE AARONSON:

 

https://www.arielleaaronson.com/projects

 

 

 

You might also enjoy:

 
The Write Advice 094: HARRY HANSEN

 
The Write Advice 064: JOY WILLIAMS

 
The Write Advice 034: DAWN POWELL

Thursday, 25 January 2018

Think About It 034: ETHEL BARRYMORE


For an actress to be a success she must have the face of a Venus, the brains of a Minerva, the grace of Terpsichore, the memory of a Macaulay, the figure of Juno, and the hide of a rhinoceros. 

Source unspecified 


 

Use the link below to read more about legendary North American actor ETHEL BARRYMORE (1879–1959), sister of fellow actors LIONEL BARRYMORE (1878–1954) and JOHN BARRYMORE (1882–1942) and great aunt of actor/producer DREW BARRYMORE (1975–):

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethel_Barrymore

 

 

You might also enjoy:

 
Think About It 013: MARLON BRANDO

 
Think About It 005: SIMONE DE BEAUVOIR

 
Think About It 003: PHYLLIS ROSE

Thursday, 18 January 2018

The Write Advice 103: ANNE LAMOTT


Is it okay with you that you blow off your writing, or whatever your creative/spiritual calling, because your priority is to go to the gym or do yoga five days a week?  Would you give us one of those days back, to play or study poetry?  To have an awakening?  Have you asked yourself lately, 'How alive am I willing to be?'  It’s all going very quickly.  It’s mid-May, for God’s sake.  Who knew.  I thought it was late February.
     It’s time to get serious about joy and fulfillment, work on our books, songs, dances, gardens.  But perfectionism is always lurking nearby, like the demonic prowling lion in the Old Testament, waiting to pounce.  It will convince you that your work-in-progress is not great, and that you may never get published.  (Wait, forget the prowling satanic lion — your parents, living or dead, almost just as loudly either way, and your aunt Beth, and your passive-aggressive friends, whom we all think you should ditch, are going to ask, 'Oh, you’re writing again? That’s nice. Do you have an agent?')… Oh my God, what if you wake up some day, and you’re 65, or 75, and you never got your memoir or novel written; or you didn’t go swimming in warm pools and oceans all those years because your thighs were jiggly and you had a nice big comfortable tummy; or you were just so strung out on perfectionism and people-pleasing that you forgot to have a big juicy creative life, of imagination and radical silliness and staring off into space like when you were a kid?  It’s going to break your heart.  Don’t let this happen.  Repent just means to change direction — and NOT to be said by someone who is waggling their forefinger at you.  Repentance is a blessing.  Pick a new direction, one you wouldn’t mind ending up at, and aim for that.  Shoot the moon.

Bird By Bird: Some Instructions on Writing and Life (1995)


 

Use the link below to read about the life and work of North American novelist and educator ANNE LAMOTT:

 

https://www.thoughtco.com/profile-of-anne-lamott-851775


 

You might also enjoy:

 
The Write Advice 084: EDITH WHARTON

 
The Write Advice 063: ROBERT CORMIER

 
The Write Advice 093: BARRY HANNAH

Thursday, 11 January 2018

Think About It 033: ANONYMOUS


Finding a way to be creative in the digital age is a very hard thing to do.  It almost feels as if every idea someone may come up with has already been done and even if it hasn’t, whatever idea that may come to mind is probably being influenced by another.  There’s a common misconception that originality is dead and in its place is simply reworked or rehashed ideologies that may improve upon the initial concept which leave a lasting feeling of 'Was it really needed?'.
      This concept is intertwined into nearly everything in life but truly comes to light in certain industries, one of which is music.  As the mainstream appeal of certain genres takes hold, it feels as if everything is just a reworked version of whatever is popular at the time.
      That’s why it’s important to look outside the realm of commonality and venture into genres and bands that don’t have the mainstream appeal –– they’re the ones who are truly reimagining what we think of certain sounds…

From an unsigned review of The Stories We Tell Ourselves (2017), an album by San Antonio band Nothing More released in September 2017.


 

Use the link below to read the full review on the Exystence website:

 

http://exystence.net/blog/2017/09/18/nothing-more-the-stories-we-tell-ourselves-2017/#more-117256

 

 

You might also enjoy:

 
Think About It 011: LEE NUTTER

 
Think About It 018: NANCY JO SALES

  
Think About It 026: GORDON LIVINGSTON

Thursday, 28 December 2017

Think About It 032: ABE OSHEROFF


Authenticity is incredibly important.  To me, authenticity comes when your thoughts, your words, and your deeds have some relation to each other.  It comes when there’s a real organic relationship between the way you think, the way you talk, and the way you act.  You have to fight for authenticity all the time in this world, and if you don’t fight for it you will get derailed… 
      Some people are afraid to think, because thinking can present problems.  When you have thoughts, you have to decide what to do with them.  We can save them and take them to a therapist, or we can go to a bar and drink them away, or we can talk about them.  But immediately we have to deal with self-censorship.  Talking honestly can have consequences.  Take an easy example.  If you’re involved in a relationship and there’s something bothering you about the relationship, and you tell the other person your thoughts, that may be the end of the relationship.  You’re in a funny bind because if you talk about it you may risk the relationship, but if you don’t talk about it you know that down the road the same problem will be there.  What do you do?  Authenticity is about making that decision.
      Then once you’ve said something, the question is, ‘What are you going to do about it?’  A lot of people don’t do anything.  Trying to be authentic is another way of saying you are struggling to let out the best part of who you are, the part that will act and take risks.  We all have a choice:  we can choose to be made by history, or we can choose to participate in making history.

Abe Osheroff: On The Joys and Risks of Living Authentically in the Empire (Robert Jensen, 2005)


 

Use the link below to read the full June 2005 interview with North American dissident and social activist ABE OSHEROFF:

 

https://robertwjensen.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Abe-Osheroff-interview-by-Robert-Jensen.pdf


 

You might also enjoy:

 
Think About It 022: CHRISTOPHER LASCH

 
Think About It 019: JOHN PILGER

 
Think About It 015: NOAM CHOMSKY